Enterprises are facing a critical juncture in how they manage their digital content. This encompasses a wide array of assets from documents and images to multimedia, with an added layer of complexity in regulated industries like banking, insurance and healthcare. The decision at hand is whether to develop an in-house system for content management or to leverage the expertise of externally managed content services. This choice is pivotal, as it significantly impacts a company’s ability to grow, adapt, and follow regulatory requirements in a swiftly evolving market.
In this article, we explore why using managed services is a strategic advantage for organizations looking to maintain a competitive edge. Managed services not only alleviate the complexities inherent in technology management but also ensure scalability and efficiency, key drivers for sustained growth in the digital landscape.
The do-it-yourself (DIY) temptation
The idea of building your own content services system often appears attractive to enterprises for several reasons: Perceived cost savings: Enterprises may initially believe that building and managing their own in-house system will save on storage costs and licensing fees associated with third-party services. Customization and control: There’s a strong appeal in having a system tailor-made to the specific needs and workflows of the business, offering a level of control over every aspect of the content management process. Security concerns: Some enterprises feel safer managing sensitive data in-house, assuming it minimizes external risks.Realities of DIY content services
However, the DIY approach has some significant challenges that can impact both the short-term implementation and the long-term functionality.- High initial costs and resource investments: The upfront investment goes beyond financial aspects. It includes time, labor, and technical resources. The costs of hiring experts, purchasing the necessary hardware and software, and dedicating time for development and testing can be substantial.
- Complexity of taxonomy: Creating a taxonomy that is both intuitive for its users and efficient for content retrieval and management is a nuanced task. It requires a deep understanding of how content is used across the organization and the ability to foresee future needs.
- Ongoing maintenance challenges: A DIY system isn’t a one-time investment. It needs continuous updates, bug fixes, and upgrades to stay relevant, efficient, and secure, requiring a dedicated team for ongoing maintenance.
- Document security: Protecting sensitive information is a complex undertaking, involving not just secure storage but also secure access, transfer, and backup protocols. This becomes even more challenging with the evolving nature of cyber threats.
- Limited scalability potential: As the company grows, its content management needs will continue to evolve. DIY systems can struggle to keep up with this growth due to limitations in the original architecture or technology, leading to potential system overloads or costly rebuilds.
- Retention, disposal, and audit requirements: Compliance with legal and industry standards for document retention, disposal, and auditing is a critical aspect that requires meticulous attention. DIY systems must be designed to meet these regulatory requirements, which can be complex and ever-changing, needing ongoing updates and modifications.
- Set of APIs: Developing and maintaining a robust set of APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) for seamless integration with other enterprise systems and third-party tools is both technically challenging and resource intensive. Yet, this aspect is crucial for ensuring that the content services system can communicate and work effectively within the broader IT ecosystem of the enterprise.